http://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/issue/feedHieroglyphs2026-01-28T14:07:07+00:00Journal editorshieroglyphs.journal@gmail.comOpen Journal Systems<p><span style="font-family: HelveticaNeue;"><span class="ContentPasted0" lang="EN-US"><em>Hieroglyphs </em>is an internationally peer-reviewed open access e-journal aiming to promote the academic study of hieroglyphs in all their dimensions in Egyptology and with a comparative angle extending to other hieroglyphic traditions and writing systems with a strongly iconic component. The journal provides a dedicated home for studies of hieroglyphs in all their semiotic, linguistic, cognitive, aesthetic, cultural, and material aspects.</span><br /></span></p>http://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/26Tꞽ.t, an Emanation of the Divine2024-11-26T10:43:38+00:00Jérôme Rizzojerome.rizzo@univ-montp3.fr<p class="p1">This lexicological analysis aims to examine the term <em>tꞽ.t</em> (<em>Wb</em> V, 239, 1–240, 11), most frequently translated as “image,” “hieroglyphic sign,” “symbol” or “form.” Following a clarification of the probable etymon, which suggests that the original meaning of <em>tꞽ.t</em> was “fragment,” this study will assess how this fundamental value may be actualized in relation to the various domains in which the term is applied. Beyond its specific meaning as a “hieroglyphic sign,” which emerges from the earliest occurrences of the term, we will explore the extent to which <em>tꞽ.t</em> may more systematically be understood as an “emanation” originating from the realm of the gods. Consequently, we will also list the reasons that appear to justify abandoning the interpretation of <em>tꞽ.t</em> as “image,” a meaning commonly accepted in the traditional rendering of the term.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Jérôme Rizzohttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/35Not so Black and White2025-07-03T14:31:09+00:00Marina Sartorim.srtx@protonmail.com<p class="p1">Studies of hieroglyphic palaeography have o!en focused on the morphology of each token, less so on the use of colour as a determinant feature in their design. The current paper relates some preliminary observations on the author’s latest project, which revolves around the visual impact the use of colour has on defining a certain graphic register (in the sense of Albert & Ragazzoli 2025) in the case of New Kingdom manuscripts. One particular instance is that of the rare presence of polychrome text in Book of the Dead manuscripts, as polychrome hieroglyphs are commonly connected to a monumental, not to a manuscript context. Through a visual analysis of both morphology <em>and</em> colour use in writings of the name and an epithet of Osiris, it will become evident that scribes had at their disposal a broad spectrum of options for bringing certain inscriptions closer to their monumental counterparts. The study will thus expand the understanding of graphic registers used in funerary manuscripts, including the diversity of colour use, and challenge the understanding of these writing media as intrinsically connected to “cursive” or “linear” script varieties.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Marina Sartorihttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/44A Note on “Hieroglyphic (Il)literacy” and Access to Inscriptions in Ancient Egypt2025-11-03T08:51:45+00:00Sami Uljassami.uljas@egyptologi.uu.se<p class="p1">The present article discusses the extent to which literacy in ancient Egypt extended to the hieroglyphic script in particular. Special attention is paid to late New Kingdom and Third Intermediate Period examples of apparently limited and non-existent understanding of the said script and its principles. It is argued that contact with hieroglyphs was not an everyday experience for the ancient Egyptians and that the rare examples of the script written by very inexperienced authors reflect the degree to which they have access to hieroglyphic texts generally. The discussion also touches upon the curiously neglected topic of access to cemeteries in Ancient Egypt.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Sami Uljashttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/53Walk Like a Wsr2025-12-09T10:45:12+00:00Julian Poschjulian.posch@oeaw.ac.at<p>This essay offers a short discussion of the sign F 78, a variant of F 12. The known attestations are collected and are presented in an appendix.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Julian Poschhttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/38A Vegetal Form of the djeser Hieroglyph in KV352025-05-24T15:40:36+00:00Isabelle Régenregen.isa@gmail.com<p>The most common forms of the <em>djeser</em> sign (Gardiner D 45) are those of a scepter or staff, either long and thin (<em>mks</em>) or short and thicker (<em>nḥb.t</em>). In the New Kingdom, vegetal forms of the Gardiner D45 sign are known, some of which have sometimes been identified with a head of lettuce. Among these plant forms, a <em>djeser</em> sign from the tomb of Amenhotep II (KV 35) stands out as it resembles a kind of branch. The vegetal appearance of the Djeser hieroglyph may already exist in the 4th Dynasty, in a more elongated form, in the tomb of Queen Meresankh III at Giza.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Isabelle Régenhttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/37Atypical Attributes of B3 (woman giving birth) Signs Created by Deir el-Medina Painters2025-05-05T13:35:58+00:00Elizabeth Bettleselizabeth_bettles@yahoo.co.uk<p class="p1">Note discussing atypical features of B3 signs.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Elizabeth Bettleshttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/42The Shape of a God2025-08-01T20:36:29+00:00Vincent Morelvincent.morel@yale.edu<p>This note examines an unusual rendering of the emblem of the little-attested god Duau in the 11th Dynasty inscription of vizier Amenemhat at Wadi Hammamat. The oblong, empty-filled sign is here suggested to be connected to Duau’s association with the city of ꜥAyn, a toponym written with a similar oblong sign enclosing either an eye or a fish.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Vincent Morelhttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/41A Unique Classifier of a Palm Frond2025-07-23T23:09:34+00:00Mostafa Tolbamostafa.tolba@fu-berlin.de<p>In Tjaennahebu’s tomb, the artisan appears to have consciously reverted to the Old Kingdom conception of a classifier derived from vegetal components. Nevertheless, the form employed does not constitute a direct replication of Old Kingdom prototypes; rather, it reflects a further adaptation consistent with the predominant Saite Period copies—specifically, a single palm midrib with projecting spines, in contrast to the earlier rendering of multiple stalks bound and sealed. This palm frond form appears to have been intended to evoke the likeness of a backbone with ribs, as exemplified in the F37B variant, thereby transforming the determinative from a mammalian-based image into a vegetal one, while preserving its underlying conceptual significance.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Mostafa Tolbahttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/40A Dancing Hoof2025-07-23T22:48:32+00:00Umberto Verdurauv2116@columbia.edu<p>Note on an unusual form of F25 which could easily be confused with Aa11.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Umberto Verdurahttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/39The “Dressed” Child, an Unintentional Variant of the Naked Child Sign2025-07-08T21:56:19+00:00Daniel González Leónd.gonzalez@yale.edu<p>The Coptos Decree R shows three examples of the child hieroglyph, in sitting position with hanging legs (on an unrepresented lap), in sunk relief.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Daniel González Leónhttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/36Kiss (the Earth) the Earth (A92)2025-04-24T17:47:58+00:00Niv AllonNiv.Allon@metmuseum.org<p>A92 classifier within the compound sn tꜣ.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Niv Allonhttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/43The “God’s Palace”2025-08-28T23:15:41+00:00Vincent Morelvincent.morel@yale.edu<p>This article examines a striking graphic variation in the writing of šps (“august, noble”)—where the conventional seated-man-of-rank sign (A50) is replaced by the shrine façade sign (O21)—in the Wadi Hammamat inscription of the Director of Works Mery, dated to the reign of Amenemhat III. This substitution reflects a deliberate semantic strategy grounded in conceptual association, one of the key mechanisms underlying enigmatic writing. By means of this graphic choice, the inscription reconceptualizes the mountain as a sacralized architectural space, evoking the quarries themselves as the god’s true dwelling place.</p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Vincent Morelhttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/56A Falcon-Headed Crocodile Hieroglyph2026-01-28T13:06:39+00:00Elsa Oréalelsa.oreal@cnrs.fr<p><span style="caret-color: #000000; color: #000000; font-family: -webkit-standard; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; display: inline !important; float: none;">When reffering to supra-human entities, the noun ꜥḫm/ꜥšm/ꜥẖm is usually classified by falcon or crocodile hieroglyphs, animals associated with vigilance through their eyes. This note argues that the falcon-headed crocodile classifier is not merely a graphic fusion but a deliberate theological allusion to the composite form of Khonsu-Shu, who functions as a vigilant guardian of the dead in the Beyond. The comparison with simpler crocodile classifiers highlights this specific iconographic choice.</span></p>2026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Elsa Oréalhttp://cipl-cloud37.segi.ulg.ac.be/index.php/hieroglyphs/article/view/57Table of Contents2026-01-28T13:10:37+00:002026-01-28T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026